Groupe Nduom, the parent company of GN Savings and Loans, whose license was revoked recently by the Bank of Ghana, has refuted claims by the opposition National Democratic Congress that, they supported the incumbent gov’t, NPP to overthrow Former John Mahama in 2015.
According the group, even though leader and founder of Progressive People’s Party (PPP) Papa Kwesi Nduom made lot of political statements against former John Mahama, it didn’t mean they supported NPP.
The group said, the NPP gov’t had the power to save them but they didn’t do it. The gov’t didn’t need to exercise discretion in their favor, they just needed to pay money to liberate the monies that have been locked up.
He described the revocation of GN Bank and savings by the Central Bank for insolvency as ‘unfortunate’ and ‘regrettable’
“Government has taken a decision that in my view is regrettable, it could have been done in another way. As we speak, gov’t have the power to save the bank they chose not to and the reason I say that is some 5 banks have not met the minimum capital requirement of 400 million, their licenses have not been revoked and they have not been reclassified.
Speaking on Class FM’s ‘State of The Nation’ monitored by GhanaNewsPage.com, management member of GN Bank and Saving who doubles as the policy advisor for Progressive People’s Party, Paa Kofi Asamoah-Siaw told Blessed Sogah “It’s not true we supported this gov’t” when asked why they are accusing the gov’t they clearly supported in the run up to 2016 election.
“We didn’t support the NPP. In an election, we were running a campaign so why would anybody expect that we will campaign for President Mahama when he was our opponent.
For the fact that, I’m campaigning that don’t vote Mahama, he was the target, he was in charge and we wanted to go to where he was so our focus was not candidate Akufo-Addo at the time, our focus was on the guy occupying the seat and it happens to be President Mahama so if Dr Nduom in all his political statement he made, said that lets change president Mahama, does that mean we should vote for Nana Akufo-Addo….he quizzed
Meanwhile, the Groupe Nduom has said the only channel to seek redress over the revocation of its license by the Bank of Ghana is to go to court.
Read the full statement below:
Additional Comments on the BOG Notice on GN Savings
We have taken note of the statement issued on August 16, 2019, by the Bank of Ghana. The notice, unfortunately, contains a number of factual inaccuracies and misrepresentations. The statement creates a false impression of the chain of events that resulted in the liquidity challenges faced by the bank and we intend to take any and all necessary steps to ensure that the record is set straight.
1.00. Closing the operations of GN Savings will be inimical to the development aspirations of the country. It will go against the strides made to bring the unbanked into the formal sector. Indeed, with its 300 offices spread throughout all the regions, GN Savings is often the only licensed financial institution in many towns.
2.00. GN Savings is not only solvent but would be highly liquid if the Ministry of Finance simply ordered itself and other government agencies to quickly pay amounts owed to GN Savings and Gold Coast and the contractors whose projects they financed.
Groupe Nduom, through GN Bank, Gold Coast Fund Management, Gold Coast Advisors, and the Ghana Growth Fund Company, has pre-financed infrastructure development in Ghana to the tune of approximately GHS 14 Billion over the past several years. Over 600 roads, bridges, schools, and other critical additions to Ghana’s infrastructure have been made possible by funds mobilized and invested by these companies.
The financing of these projects structured as loans (when from the bank) and commercial paper (when from Ghana Growth Fund Company) represented a significant proportion of the placements.
The letter written by the Ministry of Finance on August 6th, 2019 confirmed less than 10% of the amounts immediately owed to Groupe Nduom companies, both directly and indirectly. However, the Ministry of Finance itself confirmed a figure in excess of GHS 600 million in a letter to the BOG last year. We expect this government infrastructure portfolio liability and the obvious inconsistencies to be resolved in due course. When this is done, the financial picture will be clearer.
3.00. We have worked hard to bring new investments into the company. Shareholders, non-shareholder stakeholders, and related companies have liquidated and were still in the process of liquidating assets to bring cash to the bank to sustain operations. A number of third parties had reached out to explore investing in the bank.
We informed the BOG’s BSD on August 16th of a meeting to be held in London on Monday next week with a prospective investor interested in investing $100 million in GN Savings.
4.00. The allegations found on page 19 of the BOG’s Public Notice are the most concerning, as the statements made regarding funds transferred abroad are completely false. We have not transferred customer funds abroad in the manner alleged in the Public Notice. International Business Solutions (IBS) has provided a variety of services, including procurement and management consulting. IBS purchased vehicles, generators, stationery, manufacturing raw materials, computers, and a variety of other products for sister companies such as GN Savings, Coconut Grove Hotels, EPPL, and Freshpak.
These goods and services were provided over the course of 12 years. These products purchased by IBS (including the Ford, Dodge, and Fiat vehicles driven by company managers and the hundreds of bright yellow AKSA generators) are all here in Ghana in plain sight. These transactions saved the Groupe Nduom companies money by not going through intermediaries who would have charged huge margins on those products. They were all imported and all required foreign currency. That foreign currency was purchased using the funds of the depositors that required them and NOT from the deposits of the hundreds of thousands of other GN Savings customers.
Similar, the raw materials used to produce polystyrene-based products by Freshpak Company Limited and EPPL were all procured by IBS, after which those products were imported into Ghana and turned into finished products. Extensive documentation exist and have been provided to the BOG regarding every single transfer that pertained to Groupe Nduom. This documentation was made available both physically (thousands of pages of documents) and electronically. The documents have been with the BoG since 2018, and we received no response from the team.
Therefore, the statement that such a huge amount of “customer funds” was transferred abroad with “no documentation” is false and cannot be used to withdraw the SDI license.
5.0. It is also important to note that companies Groupe Nduom has built in Ghana are owed GHS 313,480,618.67 in unpaid IPCs and delayed interest, both on paid and unpaid IPCs, as of June 2019. The fact that the name “GN Bank” or “GN Savings” does not appear on an IPC does not mean that the bank is not the ultimate beneficiary.
There is also a loan portfolio of GHS 2,143,031,818.38 (nearly $400 Million) for funds that were disbursed to Ghanaian contractors working on various government projects. This portfolio is several times larger than the total amount of foreign transactions facilitated by GN Bank on behalf of Groupe Nduom. Therefore, it is difficult to understand what relevance this regulatory issue that we addressed with the BoG in 2018 has to do with anything, particularly our longstanding request for IPC payment.
Anyone who says at this time that all that the Government of Ghana’s agencies owe our companies is GHS 30 million, is being mischievous. In addition, private sector organisations owe us commercial paper/placement debts of over GHS 400 million. Our companies have millions of Ghana cedis locked up in other institutions that have been collapsed during this “clean-up” exercise and have not been able to retrieve them.
Clearly, if the Government of Ghana’s agencies had paid what is due a year ago, the Bank of Ghana would not have impaired the infrastructure portfolio, we would have been able to raise the additional capital required and GN Bank would still be a universal bank. At our peak in 2018, Groupe Nduom employed over 7,000 people, 2,000 from GN Savings (now down to 1400 ). This number has dropped to about 3,500. Not only are the jobs of 1,400 GN Savings employees at risk, but there are over 1,200
employees of GN companies who provide security and property services to the bank whose jobs are now at risk. The consequences of this action will, therefore, affect over 2,500 employees and their families
6.0. We have had to resort to the law courts in desperation and under siege. After over a year of providing documentation to agencies and regulators, our customers’ patience has been worn thin. The liquidity that payments under this portfolio would provide would surely turn our fortunes around, and the benefits will accrue not just to our employees and customers, but to the country as a whole. So why would a government and its regulators deny us payments due for legitimate work done by contractors then turn around to impair those receivables and use that fact to revoke a license to operate as an SDI.
7.0. GN Savings has not sacked its top management staff. As of Friday afternoon, that team was still at post. The BOG as a regulator must not make important decisions based on hearsay. We challenge BOG to produce the said termination letters. The Chairman of the Board of Directors in a letter written to BSD promised to deliver a new organization structure befitting the status of a Savings and loans company.
8.00. GN Savings has not closed 70 offices. Rather, the company wrote several weeks ago to BSD for approval to temporarily suspend operations in a number of offices to reduce cost during the business revival period. BSD has till today not responded to this request.
9.00. It’s important to note that GN Savings came up with new ideas that have caused its business to begin a sustained revival. Thousands of customers had started making new deposits and enjoying unrestricted withdrawals. Why would the Bank of Ghana revoke the license of such a company?
10.00. It appears that our only option is to pursue this case in the court of law – negotiating with the Bank of Ghana in good faith has yielded less than desirable results.
GN Corporate Affairs
Source: Ghana | GhanaNewsPage.com | William Kabutey Dosoo