Dr. Ekua Amoakoh Throws Shade at NDC: Is It All Talk and No Action?
Ghana’s political stage is alive with the sound of a verbal heavyweight bout, and Dr. Ekua Amoakoh is not pulling any punches. As a prominent spokesperson for the New Patriotic Party (NPP), she’s been on a relentless campaign to highlight what she sees as the National Democratic Congress (NDC) government’s biggest flaw: an inability to turn campaign promises into tangible results. In a series of sharp critiques, Dr. Amoakoh has asserted that the NDC is “good at campaigning and propaganda” but “doesn’t seem to have a plan for actual governance.” This accusation is a serious jab, and it’s landing right at the heart of the ongoing political debate as the nation looks ahead to future elections.
The NPP’s Offensive: A Strategy of Scrutiny
Dr. Ekua Amoakoh’s comments are not just random remarks; they are part of a calculated communication strategy by the NPP. By focusing on the concept of “under-delivery,” the opposition party aims to paint the current government as ineffective and unprepared to tackle the nation’s biggest challenges. Her arguments often pivot around a few key themes that resonate with a public hungry for solutions.
Also Read More: https://ghananewspage.com/shatta-wale-reacts-to-lamborghini-seizure-amid-4-7m-fraud-probe/
First, there’s the “Blame Game” accusation. Dr. Amoakoh has criticized the NDC for what she describes as a persistent habit of blaming the previous NPP administration for current problems. She argues that this approach is a sign of a government that lacks a clear vision and is unwilling to take ownership of the issues it faces. This message is designed to position the NPP as a party that accepts responsibility and gets things done, in stark contrast to an NDC she portrays as a perpetual victim.
Secondly, Dr. Amoakoh’s critiques often zero in on economic performance. She and other NPP communicators have consistently raised concerns about the stability of the Ghanaian cedi and the overall health of the economy under NDC’s leadership. This focus is particularly potent because economic hardship is a topic that hits close to home for every Ghanaian. By questioning the NDC’s economic plan, the NPP is attempting to erode public trust and present itself as the more competent economic manager.
Third, she has made bold claims that the NDC’s actions are jeopardizing Ghana’s international goodwill and reputation. This is a powerful appeal to national pride and a warning that the government’s perceived missteps could have long-term consequences on the international stage.
A Battle of Narratives: Propaganda vs. Performance
The political arena in Ghana is a battlefield of narratives, and the clash between the NPP and NDC is a masterclass in modern political communication. While the NDC, under President John Mahama, has been touting its achievements and future-focused policies—such as the 24-hour economy and initiatives to “Reset Ghana”—the NPP is focusing on what they see as the government’s failures and shortcomings.
The NDC’s strategy is to project an image of a government that is actively working to solve problems and build a better future. They point to economic data, such as Ghana’s provisional real GDP growth of 5.3 percent in the first quarter of 2025, as evidence of a recovering and stable economy. They have also launched initiatives and projects designed to show they are delivering on their promises, from infrastructure projects to social programs.
However, Dr. Amoakoh and the NPP are keen to counter this narrative. Their strategy is not to deny the existence of these projects but to question their effectiveness and to highlight the gap between what was promised and what has been delivered. They are challenging the government to move beyond symbolic gestures and into a realm of concrete, impactful governance that genuinely improves the lives of everyday Ghanaians.
What Does It Mean for the Electorate?
For the average Ghanaian, this political back-and-forth can be confusing. Both parties present compelling arguments, and the truth often lies somewhere in the middle. The NPP’s accusations of under-delivery force the NDC to defend its record, but the NDC’s counter-arguments also put the NPP’s own past performance under a microscope. This constant scrutiny, while at times feeling like a “blame game,” is an essential part of a functioning democracy. It holds leaders accountable and forces them to justify their actions.
The real test for both parties will come in the next election. The NDC must convince the public that it has a solid plan for governance and that its policies are making a real difference. The NPP must convince the public that it is a credible alternative, capable of delivering on its promises where the NDC has supposedly failed. Dr. Ekua Amoakoh’s youthful, clear, and direct communication style is a key part of the NPP’s strategy to win that narrative battle. She is not just a spokesperson; she is a political messenger, framing the debate in a way that aims to resonate with a population that wants to see real change, not just political promises.
As Ghana navigates its economic and social challenges, the battle over who is best suited to lead the country will be defined by these competing narratives. Dr. Amoakoh’s claims of “under-delivery” are a powerful weapon in this fight, and the NDC will have to work tirelessly to prove her wrong.
